1. What are you most proud of in your Lesson 2 Presentation and why?
I am most proud of my enunciation through out the presentation because I usually have a low volume while speaking. Also I am really proud of the organization of my presentation and how it flowed really well and caused me to meet the minimum time limit.
2. a. What assessment would you give yourself on your Lesson 2 Presentation (self-assessment)?
P
b. Explain why you deserve that grade using evidence from the Lesson 2 component contract.
According to the lesson 2 component contract, I give myself a P. I don't think I had any concern with professionalism because I spoke loud and clear, made eye contact, and engaged and interacted with the audience. No concern with the organization and creativity nor the audience involvement. Also, I provided more than 1 quality published research source cited.
3. What worked for you in your Lesson 2?
Having more time to present really helped me and worked for me in my lesson 2. I was able to say whatever I needed to say and go into depth about it. Another thing that worked was being able to have a powerpoint because it really helped organize my presentation and helped me stay on track with time.
4. What didn't work? If you had a time machine, what would you have done differently to improve your Lesson 2?
I would have done my activity differently. I would've came up with a more engaging and creative activity that helped the audience further learn my answer but 10 minutes was just not enough time to do a different more engaging activity.
5. What do you think your answer #2 is going to be?
I think my answer #2 is going to be the improvement of standards set in forensics with federal support. Basically, getting more funding to improve forensic techniques and further research to reduce human error and reduce the number of wrongful convictions.
No comments:
Post a Comment